Pickachow!

The rants, ravings, musings, and general dickery of a hipster-esque ginger. Side-note: If you can figure out what "justsoelmo" means, you've just made a best friend for life.


Ask me about our specials!   Submit
Reblogged from kiradax

Whats been happening in Scotland for those who don’t know

kiradax:

Scotland has been building up to voting on whether they should become Independent from the United Kingdom since 2012, the Idea’s been in the works since the ’50s. Yes voters want to be independent, No voters want to stay in the UK.

The parties backing Yes are the snp, the greens and the socialists, the parties backing No (also known as better together or no thanks) are the tories, labour, lib dems aka the big 3 of shittery

reasons scotland would want independence

  • our votes literally don’t count seriously like in a mentaphor you guys would understand it would be as though our entire country voted democrat but the republicans still got into government because the uk is heavily imbalanced
  • literally the population of the whole of scotland = the population of london.
  • don’t want to be a part of illegal wars
  • the maj. of scotland has a socialist sentiment so you could argue we don’t want to be associated w the capitalist uk
  • england has been storing their nuclear weapons here for years, making us a target for attack, because they dont care about scottish lives
  • basically used scotland as lab rats for taxes and shitty policies so england didnt suffer
  • we have free tuition which the english govt want to take away
  • we have free healthcare but westminster wants to privatise it which will badly affect scotland as the poorest nation

during the run up to the independence referendum, (referred to as #indyref for shorthand, &please use the indyref tag to talk abt these issues) the yes campaign released hugely detailed plans for an Independent Scotland, the no side produced nothing but scaremongering and outright lies about mysterious ‘new powers’ scotland would get if we stayed in the uk.

There were huge debates which took ages and i cba hashing out again but basically Yes had a more vocal support.

on the 18th sept we all voted and last night/this morning the results came in as an overwhelming result for No. this is bad as it means scotland is stuck in the racist, imperialist uk which supports illegal wars and looks like it’s going to be run by fascists by the next general election. here’s what happened in the horus following this morning;s announcement

i don’t know much more yet because this is the first day since the vote + i had no sleep after watching the results till 7am so i’ll be periodically reblogging more stuff as it unfolds. followers in west lothian and glasgow keep safe and maybe hide or obscure your yes flags/stickers to keep yourself safe

basically a lot of uncertainty, people have been literally stabbed and businesses burned down. keep an eye on the indyref and scotland tags + my blog if you want to know the latest. scotland’s time zone is UTC+0.

(via r0bohobo)

Reblogged from harrypotterdailly

Deathly Hallows book quotes

(Source: harrypotterdailly, via r0bohobo)

Reblogged from lilreem
cassbones:

lilreem:

me: come sleep overguy: yesme: sike *friendzoned*

*for use of straight boy sleepovers.
No homo, bro

cassbones:

lilreem:

me: come sleep over
guy: yes
me: sike *friendzoned*

*for use of straight boy sleepovers.

No homo, bro

(via r0bohobo)

Reblogged from maggotmaster

(Source: maggotmaster, via r0bohobo)

Reblogged from runnerbird

(Source: runnerbird, via slytherenne)

Reblogged from maquisleader

epyonac:

maquisleader:

It’s a million laughs around the Science Bros

Is it sad I’m laughing at the first pic?

Reblogged from steven-stoned
epyonac:

steven-stoned:

uranianumbra:

steven-stoned:


im playing 13 pokemon


you taped silver to a psp

no thats me playing it

no thats you disrespecting the better hand held
you sir, GTFO!

epyonac:

steven-stoned:

uranianumbra:

steven-stoned:

im playing 13 pokemon

you taped silver to a psp

no thats me playing it

no thats you disrespecting the better hand held

you sir, GTFO!

Reblogged from letenglandshake-deactivated2012

zeoiakuesk:

fall is almost here guys

image

I didn’t think this gif could be used properly with anything. I was wrong.

(via epyonac)

Reblogged from jimmy-the-satanist
yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:



Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:
First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]
Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.
Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?
Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???
Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.[Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO
Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.
That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

yuki-menoko:

gloomandhowitgetsthatway:

k17l53:

sugar-soul:

image

Thanks satan.

What the fuck man

This post goes around on this site and everytime I see it, as a Theologist in making it annoys me to see these “militiant atheists” (or fedoraists, to seperate the good ones from the bad ones, cause I love you guys) who tries to falsely accuse the Holy Scriptures with things that are never said in either of the scriptures. "That women are to be sold if they were raped" in the Bible or "That women must sexually submit to men" in the Qu’ran. Ofcourse, I’m not trying to prove Satanism wrong, I don’t really care what people believe in, but I’m here to correct the misinterpretations by Tumblr’s gullible community as a way to educate, because it might actually interest you to know some real facts about what the Abrahamic religions says on the matter:

  • First of all - YOU ALL KNOW THAT ADULTERY IS PROHIBITED IN EITHER SCRIPTURES, YET YOU TRY TO TURN THOSE VERSES UPSIDE DOWN FOR YOUR OWN PLEASURE. 
    [17:32, 25:68-70, Quran] 
    [Exodus 20:14 Proverbs 6:32 Hebrew 13:4]

  • Second - There are no verses that said so, never has that been said.

  • Third - Noone sells women when they’ve been violated, who even does that today?

  • Fourth - Do you guys actually read the scriptures AT ALL???

  • Fifth - There’s one verse in Deuteronomy that claims that a Man should marry and stay with the woman if she’d been violated by him and pay her 50 shekels. [Deuteronomy 22:29]
    1. Christians do not follow the Torah/Old Testament anymore, they follow the New Testament. It’s called the New Covenant, and Jesus never claimed anything about selling women in the Gospels.
    2. The rapist is required to marry his victim, and is not permitted to divorce her without her consent. The Talmud explains that this obligation rests on the rapist,  NOT THE VICTIM. She is under no obligation to marry him.  ”He must pay fifty shekels to compensate her for the lack of gifts, and is also forced to marry her, should she desire it” says Bible commentator and philosopher Rabbi Isaac Abarbanel, so you won’t bash Judaism for that either.
    [Talmud, Ketubot 49b]
  • Fifth - FOR THE LAST TIME, USE SOURCES FOR THE VERSES THAT SAYS SO

  • Sixth - Rape is strictly forbidden in either scriptures and can result in a mild case of THE DEADNESS - not only is it Adultery, but in Islam, Christianity as well as Judaism it’s an act of terror against an individual and society.

That post has over 100,000 notes, can you believe that at least 50,000 people on this Shaytaan website fell for it and assumes that we all condone such acts? 

(Source: jimmy-the-satanist, via epyonac)

Reblogged from humourandgaming-deactivated2014